Final December, varied media retailers reported that Richmond Hill councilor Karen Cilevitz and her husband, Derek Christie, had been dealing with prison fees. Cilevitz was charged with greater than $ 5,000 fraud and breach of belief by a public official; Christie was charged with greater than $ 5,000 fraud and possession of proceeds of crime.
That sounds severe. Nevertheless, an important particulars behind the alleged fraud weren’t reported. Bye now.
Insurgent Information was capable of find the sufferer of the fraud to seek out out his model of the story. And what a narrative it’s.
Patty Burton Garcia was employed by Cilevitz to work as a part-time assistant for the Ward 5 counselor starting in the summertime of 2019. Her wage was $ 25,000, and Patty earned about $ 900 each two weeks. However from the day he acquired his first test, issues took a perverse flip. That’s, Patty says Cilevitz knowledgeable her that she would take the lion’s share of Patty’s test (often about $ 800) which she would share along with her partner, Christie. Lastly, Cilevitz and Christie allegedly sued Patty for about $ 21,000, or greater than 80% of her revenue.
Extremely, Patty accepted the drastic pay reduce as she had a need to contribute to the general public service and was capable of go away along with her pension. However the next 12 months issues went awry across the time of taxes. Her accountant knowledgeable Patty that as a result of she was incomes her full wage on paper, she owed the Canadian Tax Company about $ 4,000. She was shocked. And Patty says that when she informed Cilevitz concerning the impending tax impression, the councilor allegedly responded with three phrases: “It isn’t my drawback.”
Sadly, this quickly grew to become a giant drawback for Cilevitz when the police began investigating. Prices for fraud quickly adopted.
Sadly, this isn’t the primary time Cilevitz has been in bother. Insurgent Information reported that Cilevitz acquired 90 days’ wage following an investigation by town’s integrity commissioner. It was decided that he had harassed a voter, Steffi Goodfield. In an offended voice message, Cilevitz by Steffi, the counselor warned that solely she might use the time period “Ward 5”. You’ll want to take heed to the shattered voice message to imagine it …
We contacted Cilevitz to seek out out her model of the story, however she declined to remark.
Within the meantime, try Patty’s superb story about how she was scammed with over $ 20,000. In the meantime, the Cilivetz case continues to undergo the courts. Its subsequent look is scheduled for July 11. Keep tuned.